Lisa’s
blues
To illustrate how Lisa’s motivations align with the value
component of the expectancy and value theories (EVT), I chose to focus on an
episode called Lisa’s Blues. One key understanding of the value
construct is that it is multidimensional. It can be both distal related to a
more trait-like personality characteristic but also proximal fluctuating from
situation to situation. That is Lisa’s case too. While she is a model child
with previously unchanged intrinsic motivation for school, for instance, one
day Lisa experiences a mood swing (or?) and she loses her motivation to do
anything. “What’s the point? There is so much suffering in the world. Will it
make a difference if I don’t wake up one morning?” Lisa’s questioning stems
from trait-like distal values and beliefs she has such as an innate stable interest
in the wellbeing of the world, in higher meanings of life, in her scope of
agency and of her ability to make a positive difference. In other words, that
day, Lisa has no expectancy for success (she feels her agency will not help change
the world for the better), which causes her not to engage in the day’s
activities (school, family), feeling no more enjoyment, interest, utility, or
benefits from doing them. These activity values are more proximal categories that
Eccles, in her EVT model, labeled subjective task values and listed as follows:
attainment value, intrinsic value, utility value and relative cost. Attainment
value has been associated to the importance of doing well on a specific
activity or task. Intrinsic value has been equated to interest or enjoyment one
gains from engaging in an activity. Utility is about the perception of future usefulness
of doing a present activity. The relative cost in EVT refers to how doing a
present activity negatively affects a person emotionally, or in terms of effort
load or missed opportunities for doing something more valued.
That day, Lisa feels all these things combined. While we don’t
know the proximal trigger for these feelings, we can see how the situational
factors in her immediate environment affect her current state of mind. Her family,
again, one by one, initially does not pay attention to her “mood” relying on their previous perceptions
of her always doing fine. Lisa begins to see the flaws in her family members:
her materialistic father, her mother concerned with appearances, her brother
who is only interested in silly superficial fun. Although Lisa still says
things that reflect her more stable personality traits (“Don’t go for the glitter.
Look for substance”), her day is overwhelmed by sadness and distrust. Playing
saxophone becomes her only relief, and jamming with a blues player in the street,
seems to be a turning point in her emotional state. This blues player, and
later, her mom in a sudden realization, tell her that it is okay to be sad if
that means to be yourself in a given moment. Making a blues song about her
imperfect family helped Lisa own, process, and overcome her sadness… In the end,
the whole Simpson family goes to a jazz club to listen to Lisa’s blues player
friend, actually singing Lisa’s song about her unsupportive family (something like
“My father belongs to a zoo” etc.). Finally, putting her negative feelings out
there had a cathartic effect. In the end, she, and everyone else understood the
gravity of the moment and moved on.
Beyond the specifics of the plot, Lisa’s
story in this episode, illustrated the intricate causal linkages between manifest
situational values for present activities and more elusive overarching multilayers
in terms of cultural milieu, socialization, trait, and state cognitive and
affective factors that trigger children’s specific interpretations of
experiences, and ultimate behaviors.
Lovely analysis! You clearly explain the theoretical components. I particularly appreciated your weaving the components into your examples of Lisa's story. Really interesting for me as a read, and well done!
ReplyDelete